Documentation
  • 🍻Intro
    • Why API Security is Critical?
    • Pynt at a Glance
    • Who Should Use Pynt?
  • 👩‍💻API Security Testing
    • Security Testing Overview
    • Prerequisites for Running Pynt Scans
    • How to Install Pynt CLI
    • How to install Pynt Binary (Linux only)
    • Pynt CLI Modes
      • 🔵Pynt Command CLI Mode
      • 🔵Pynt Listen CLI Mode
    • Pynt Security Tests Coverage
      • Business Logic Tests
      • Injection Tests
      • Authentication Bypass Tests
      • Mass Assignment Tests
      • Server-Side Request Forgery Tests
      • Stack Trace In Response
      • Lack of Resources and Rate Limiting
      • File Path Manipulation
      • GraphQL Introspection Vulnerability
      • GraphQL Alias Overloading
      • LLM APIs Vulnerabilities
      • Insecure Transport Scheme
      • Basic Authentication
      • HTTP Desynchronization (Desync) Attack
    • Sensitive Data Exposure Detection
    • Pynt Scans Troubleshooting
      • Pynt CLI Troubleshooting
      • Pynt for Postman Troubleshooting
        • Troubleshoot Pynt Container not Running Error
        • Troubleshoot Empty API Key Error
        • Troubleshoot Unauthorized API Key Error
        • Troubleshoot Collection Not Found Error
        • Troubleshoot Non-Unique Collection Name Error
        • Troubleshoot Empty Collection Identifier Error
        • Troubleshoot Unreachable Target Error
        • Troubleshoot Target Responds with Errors Error
        • Troubleshoot Unresolved Target Domain Error
        • Troubleshoot Unresolved Variable Error
        • Troubleshoot TLS Handshake Fail Error
        • Troubleshoot Few Requests Error
        • Troubleshoot One User Only Error
        • Troubleshoot Failed Assertions Error
    • How To
      • How to Run Business Logic Tests with Pynt
      • How to associate a Pynt scan to an Application in Pynt Dashboard
      • How to tag a scan in Pynt
    • Benchmarks
      • Pynt vs OWASP crAPI
  • 🤲Security Testing Integrations
    • 🟠Pynt with API Testing Tools
      • 🔘Pynt for Postman
        • Fork Pynt Collection
        • Run Pynt Container
        • Run Pynt in Postman
        • View Scan Results in Postman
      • 🔘Pynt for Insomnia
      • 🔘Pynt for ReadyAPI
    • 🟠Pynt with API Testing CLIs
      • 🔘Pynt for Newman (Postman CLI)
      • 🔘Pynt for TestRunner (ReadyAPI CLI)
    • 🟠Pynt with Testing Frameworks
      • 🔘Pynt for .NET (xUnit)
      • 🔘Pynt for Selenium
      • 🔘Pynt for Rest Assured
      • 🔘Pynt for Jest
      • 🔘Pynt for pytest
      • 🔘Pynt for Go
      • 🔘Pynt for JMeter
    • 🟠Pynt on CI/CD
      • ❗How to get Pynt ID for CI/CD Authentication
      • 🔘Pynt for GitHub Actions
      • 🔘Pynt for Azure DevOps Pipelines
      • 🔘Pynt for GitLab
      • 🔘Pynt for Jenkins
    • 🟠Pynt with Burp Suite
    • 🟠Pynt with Browsers
      • 🔘Pynt for Firefox Browser
    • 🟠Live Traffic Connectors
      • 🔘eBPF
        • 🔘Key Components
      • 🔘Traffic Mirroring
    • 🟠Advanced Pynt Examples
      • 🔘Pynt as a Standalone Container
      • 🔘Pynt with Prerecorded Har Files
      • 🔘Pynt with cURL
  • 🈸Applications View
    • Application View Overview
    • Manage Applications
      • Add Application
      • Delete Application
      • Rename Application
    • Manage Sources for API Discovery
      • Add Source
      • Delete Source
      • View Source Info
      • Source Categories
        • API Documentation
          • Swagger
          • Postman Collection
        • API Gateways
          • AWS API Gateway
          • Azure API Gateway
          • Kong API Gateway
          • GCP API Gateway
          • Gravitee API Gateway
        • Testing (API Security Scans)
        • Live Traffic
          • Data Collection with eBPF
          • ALB Traffic Capture with AWS Traffic Mirroring
        • Code Repository
    • Application Dashboard
    • Generate Pentest Report
  • 📚API Catalog
    • API Catalog Overview
    • Navigate API Catalog
      • Filtering API Catalog by Application
      • API Catalog Customization
      • API Related Info
      • APIs at Risk
    • Manage API Source Gaps
      • New APIs
      • Untested APIs
      • Shadow APIs
      • Undocumented APIs
    • View Detailed Endpoint Info
  • ⏪Scan History
    • Scan History Overview
    • Navigate Scan History
      • Associating Scans with Specific Application
      • Filtering by Application
      • Scan Related Info
      • Scan History Customization
    • View Detailed Scan Info
    • Associate Vulnerabilities to Tickets with JIRA
  • Account Management
    • Single Sign-On (SSO)
      • Setting up Okta
      • Setting up Entra ID
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • What are the common mistakes made by developers?
  • How can I fix Mass Assignment issues?
  • Test cases in this category:
  1. API Security Testing
  2. Pynt Security Tests Coverage

Mass Assignment Tests

Dive into Pynt's documentation on security tests for mass assignment vulnerabilities! Discover how Pynt safeguards against unauthorized access and manipulation of sensitive data.

PreviousAuthentication Bypass TestsNextServer-Side Request Forgery Tests

Last updated 9 months ago

At a Glance: 🛡️ Mass Assignment Vulnerability occurs when attackers manipulate or inject unexpected data into an API request, allowing them to modify data they shouldn’t have access to. This security issue arises when APIs accept and process more data fields than intended, often due to improper validation or filtering of input, leading to unauthorized data manipulation.


What are the common mistakes made by developers?

This vulnerability typically arises when an API allows a client to submit multiple parameters in a single request, and those parameters can be used to update or create database records without validating that the request includes only the expected parameters. The attacker can exploit this by submitting additional parameters to the request, which are not validated by the API, allowing them to modify or create data in unintended ways.

One of the most well-known cases occurred in 2012, when a vulnerability was discovered in the Ruby on Rails web application framework, which allowed attackers to exploit mass assignment vulnerabilities in Rails-based applications.

The vulnerability was caused by the default behavior of Rails' mass assignment feature, which allowed developers to easily assign multiple attributes to a model object at once.

How can I fix Mass Assignment issues?

Validate all input data, only accept the data that is necessary for the request, and ensure that the data is consistent with the intended operation, do not use one liners to blindly load all the parameters to an object. APIs can also use data binding techniques to map only the data that is explicitly allowed to be updated to the corresponding database fields, while ignoring the rest of the data in the request

Test cases in this category:

This test case manipulates object properties from requests which the user should not have access to:

Test case
OWASP
CWE

[MA001] Mass assignment by manipulation of hidden attributes

This test case manipulates boolean flags from requests that should not have access to these flags:

Test case
OWASP
CWE

[MA002] Mass assignment by flag overloading

👩‍💻
API6 OWASP API Top 10
CWE-915
API6 OWASP API Top 10
CWE-915